{"id":53686,"date":"2025-06-24T08:50:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-24T06:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.acea.auto\/?post_type=publications&p=53686"},"modified":"2025-06-24T09:14:37","modified_gmt":"2025-06-24T07:14:37","slug":"position-paper-roadworthiness-package","status":"publish","type":"publications","link":"https:\/\/www.acea.auto\/publication\/position-paper-roadworthiness-package\/","title":{"rendered":"Position paper – Roadworthiness Package"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The European Commission’s Roadworthiness Package consists of directives for Periodical Technical Inspections (PTIs), Roadside Inspections (RSI), and vehicle registrations. It represents a significant step in improving road safety and environmental standards across the EU.<\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n

The European Automobile Manufacturers\u2019 Association (ACEA) is concerned the Commission preferred a Directive to a Regulation for its proposed revision of the package. Indeed, opting for a Regulation would secure the implementation of a harmonised legal framework for vehicles in each EU member state, equally reducing operating costs for all economic operators, while delivering solid environmental benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Multiple studies proved the introduction of PTIs on vehicles increased road safety significantly. However, extending the scope of inspections and adding requirements without adequately analysing their necessity, safety relevance, or cost implications, would only increase bureaucratic demands with minimal impact on tangible road safety improvement in Europe. A study commissioned by ACEA<\/a> in 2024 shows that technical defects are found on less than 1% of cars involved in fatal accidents and only at a fraction of this the technical defects are the root cause for the accident.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To enhance vehicle safety on our roads, the automotive industry advocates for more accurate data on the root causes of fatal accidents, and further harmonisation of the scope of PTIs, methods, and intervals resulting in mutual recognition of certificates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ACEA\u2019s key recommendations are as follows:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Excessive data sharing requirements should be avoided<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Avoid conflicting regulation on assessment of software version and integrity<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Exhaust emission tests are useful in PTIs, but noise measurements are overly challenging<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Periodic odometer reading and reporting requires further development<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. PTI tests should consider the obsolescence of electronic systems or the infrastructure on which their proper functioning depends<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n\t\t
    \n\t\t\t
    The introduction of PTIs for vehicles has significantly increased road safety. Extending the scope of inspections and adding requirements without adequately analysing their necessity, safety relevance, or cost impact risks increasing bureaucracy and bringing only minimal improvement to road safety in Europe.<\/div>\n\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t
    \n \n <\/i>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n \n <\/i>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n \n <\/i>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n \n <\/i>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n \n <\/i>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/a>\n \n <\/i>\n <\/span>\n <\/span>\n <\/a><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n
    ACEA Position paper – Roadworthiness Package<\/a><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
    \n